1000 Modifications This section is specifically for questions and advice pertaining to mods of the current 1000 models.

To K&N or not to K&N

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-12-2005, 10:22 PM
jg's Avatar
jg
jg is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default To K&N or not to K&N

What do I do?

We have a 2004 CBR 1000RR with Akrapovic and Power Commander. I am told that the K&N will make absolutly no difference from two different dealers, except perhaps change the sound.

Does anyone have an opinion on this. Did I waste my money already mapping this with the factory filter?

jg
 
  #2  
Old 12-12-2005, 10:34 PM
GONECRAZY's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: festus,mo
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: To K&N or not to K&N

keep your factory filter...i have seen dynos where the k&n dropped in power
 
  #3  
Old 12-12-2005, 10:52 PM
jg's Avatar
jg
jg is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: To K&N or not to K&N

I have heard that as well, yet everyone is always talking K&N. How does the increase air flow drop the power I wonder?
 
  #4  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:43 AM
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: To K&N or not to K&N

I keep hearing changing the filter does nothing but change sound. I am going to for go the filter "upgrade" and I am the first to admit I like to mod my bike. Other then my dark Puig screen and flush mount signals all my mods are for performance reasons and I am staying stock.
 
  #5  
Old 01-05-2006, 02:19 AM
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: To K&N or not to K&N

I've heard that K&N's make no difference on this bike, and have lost of some in the past (RC51 etc).

I have seen 2 different dyno's on 2 different 1000RR's with the BMC RACE filters, and they GAINED
almost exactly 2.00hp - Also, the BMC's are about a pound lighter then stock. The BMC's are a good
mod, but I suggest only replacing them on track bikes, or when your OEM is dirty/used up.
 
  #6  
Old 01-05-2006, 07:01 AM
Anubis's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: To K&N or not to K&N

A Race Filter is for just that.... Race. It will allow alot more air through but also alot more crap since it was never designed for the Street.
 
  #7  
Old 01-05-2006, 11:04 AM
jg's Avatar
jg
jg is offline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: To K&N or not to K&N

Good point
 
  #8  
Old 01-05-2006, 01:13 PM
decannon04's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: To K&N or not to K&N

I think since some of us rode dirtbikes and atv's. Changing the air filter makes a big difference. People think this is the same for streetbikes. It isn't. Stay stock.
 
  #9  
Old 01-09-2006, 02:01 AM
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: To K&N or not to K&N

I just couldn't stay stock, but I went for the 4-layer BMC Street's over the 2-Layer BMC Race.
Havn't dyno'd, but it does sound a little different.
Saw no difference @ The drag strip either.

Stay stock. Best bang for the buck.
 
  #10  
Old 03-18-2006, 05:52 PM
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: To K&N or not to K&N

I WENT K&N DID NOT NOTICE ANY LOOSE OR GAIN. DOES SOUND DIFFERENT.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.