clutchless gearchange
#31
03-18-2011, 02:42 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
I was actually just being an *******. But someone who has a PC with a quick shifter (which requires more hardware than just the PC) and doesn't ride track is kidding him/herself. Unless you have a physical disability, it is useless on the street, 100%. Usually guys who do that kind of stuff are douche bags...universally.
BUT ...remember the golden rule in this and many other forums ....
" if you have nothing positive to say .....shut the **** up and say nothing "
lol ....... haveagoodone everyone and stay chilled .....
Last edited by CBRclassic; 03-19-2011 at 04:21 PM.
#33
03-18-2011, 05:39 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Don't threaten me. If you're going to ban me do it.
EDIT: On second thought, forget what I said, I don't give a ****.
News flash .... I can and will " threaten " as you put it , anyone that does not stay within our guide lines mate ...
So consider yourself banned for a while...
Last edited by CBRclassic; 03-18-2011 at 05:43 PM.
#35
03-27-2011, 03:53 PM
#36
03-28-2011, 01:05 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
#37
03-28-2011, 08:09 AM
Glad you agree with me. I see this to many times in the automotive world. People trying to be unique verse everyone else and end up doing more damage then good. I would just ride it how it was design.
#38
03-28-2011, 11:20 AM
2. It causes less strain on the powertrain than using the clutch if done right.
3. It's a free 'mod', unlike a quick shift kit that costs hundreds of dollars.
#39
03-28-2011, 01:18 PM
I would like to see physical proof that if done right it does less drivetrain wear. I mean like a full blown out testing not one person's bike. Not trying to be rude at all but just not jumping the gun of somebody's he said she said thing.
