pictures
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC area
I was NOT UP IN PA guys. I got the VW at the MD Fitzgerald.
However A trip soon would be good. Dylan - the better half and I were discussing coming up there sometime soon. I think she just wants to take a mini road trip in the new car haha.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC area
Dude half your posts are a glitch anyways from the merge. I know the truth.
You can't fool NateDiesel.
Edit: And I bet i'm way more than 60%.
Come on D-Sauce. Spill it.
You can't fool NateDiesel.
Edit: And I bet i'm way more than 60%.
Come on D-Sauce. Spill it.
That puts me right in the neighborhood of 2128 posts....
If my calculations are correct...
If my calculations are correct...
If 60% of your posts were in off topic, they wouldn't be counted.
So you would need your total post count (x) in the following equation:
x*.40 = 1325 (your post count as counted)
x = 1325/.40
x = 3312
This concludes your math lesson. lol
It was a good guess, but really more like 50% of your posts were in off topic.
Your actual count was 2591.
The best I can do is count the posts up by doing a full search and then seeing how many total posts you have on the results counter. I'm not exactly sure how accurate this is... or if your regular count would include deleted posts (I don't think it will)
These are approximate based on last night:
Nate- 2280
JP - 2591
Z - 4405
All that was really proven in this experiment is that I'm better than all three of you combined.
(I was gonna try to check CBRClassic's, but I was afraid it would break the site... lol)
Actually, your calculations aren't correct. lol...
If 60% of your posts were in off topic, they wouldn't be counted.
So you would need your total post count (x) in the following equation:
x*.40 = 1325 (your post count as counted)
x = 1325/.40
x = 3312
This concludes your math lesson. lol
It was a good guess, but really more like 50% of your posts were in off topic.
Your actual count was 2591.
The best I can do is count the posts up by doing a full search and then seeing how many total posts you have on the results counter. I'm not exactly sure how accurate this is... or if your regular count would include deleted posts (I don't think it will)
These are approximate based on last night:
Nate- 2280
JP - 2591
Z - 4405
All that was really proven in this experiment is that I'm better than all three of you combined.
(I was gonna try to check CBRClassic's, but I was afraid it would break the site... lol)
If 60% of your posts were in off topic, they wouldn't be counted.
So you would need your total post count (x) in the following equation:
x*.40 = 1325 (your post count as counted)
x = 1325/.40
x = 3312
This concludes your math lesson. lol
It was a good guess, but really more like 50% of your posts were in off topic.
Your actual count was 2591.
The best I can do is count the posts up by doing a full search and then seeing how many total posts you have on the results counter. I'm not exactly sure how accurate this is... or if your regular count would include deleted posts (I don't think it will)
These are approximate based on last night:
Nate- 2280
JP - 2591
Z - 4405
All that was really proven in this experiment is that I'm better than all three of you combined.
(I was gonna try to check CBRClassic's, but I was afraid it would break the site... lol)
Hehe. Right. I did that backwards. Still not a bad guess though. Let's all check back again at the same time next year :P
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC area
Now get back to your corner
And Z-- I think your merge theory is right, nate
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
