McPukes Monopoly Game Board
#32
10-21-2008, 02:49 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pearl City, HI
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: McPukes Monopoly Game Board
Damn, Hostility, Hate? Why. You dont wanna play? Dont enter. Too easy. Me, Im no big Mcdonalds fan. Its just on the right side of the road on my way to work every day. **** man!!! Ebinz, I preciate you taking the time to do this. You alright with me bro. Its a free game, and it takes little effort to play. If I dont win, oh well. I still make an excellent salary!!! Holla
#33
10-21-2008, 03:20 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: McPukes Monopoly Game Board
Should we put a cap at the number of people we can have per piece? There's no use if we're going to share a $50 prize if 50 people are in it. If we do put a cap, I suggest adjusting accordingly the number of people we cap the piece at in relation to the prize; ie low prize = less people, bigger prize = more people allowed.
#34
10-21-2008, 07:08 AM
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: McPukes Monopoly Game Board
REALITY CHECK...If you get a rare piece and are dumb enough to not realize that it would cost you $10 in food to get the other missing pieces, then you deserve to lose half the prize by sharing it with somebody you don't even know. Why does everybody think I'm bashing people by telling you this??? I'm trying to help here, so hear me out...
Let me explain how the monopoly game works. They make hundreds of millions of the COMMON pieces. I'll use the $50,000 prize as an example. There are millions and millions and millions and millions of 269 (North Carolina Ave) and 268 (Pacific Ave) pieces out there for people to collect. There are only a set number of 270 (Pennsylvania Ave) pieces. For example, if they were giving out 10 $50,000 prizes this year, there would be10 Pennsylvania Ave pieces. Makes sense so far, right?
So if you manage to get ahold of a 270, and you are dumb enough to come to this forum and split the money with somebody who can give you a 268 and 269, then you deserve to lose that money because it would have cost you the price of 10 extra value meals to get every common piece that McDonalds makes.
If you guys want to continue to rip into me and bash me for trying to help some potentially naive fool from coming onto this thread and giving money to somebody who doesn't deserve it, please do. I eat at McD's quite a bit, and if I stumble upon a rare piece without having the common pieces to go with it, you'd better believe that I'm gonna eat more McDonalds and get the easy to find pieces rather than share my winnings with some guys on the internet that refuse to accept that it's a controlled game.
Let me explain how the monopoly game works. They make hundreds of millions of the COMMON pieces. I'll use the $50,000 prize as an example. There are millions and millions and millions and millions of 269 (North Carolina Ave) and 268 (Pacific Ave) pieces out there for people to collect. There are only a set number of 270 (Pennsylvania Ave) pieces. For example, if they were giving out 10 $50,000 prizes this year, there would be10 Pennsylvania Ave pieces. Makes sense so far, right?
So if you manage to get ahold of a 270, and you are dumb enough to come to this forum and split the money with somebody who can give you a 268 and 269, then you deserve to lose that money because it would have cost you the price of 10 extra value meals to get every common piece that McDonalds makes.
If you guys want to continue to rip into me and bash me for trying to help some potentially naive fool from coming onto this thread and giving money to somebody who doesn't deserve it, please do. I eat at McD's quite a bit, and if I stumble upon a rare piece without having the common pieces to go with it, you'd better believe that I'm gonna eat more McDonalds and get the easy to find pieces rather than share my winnings with some guys on the internet that refuse to accept that it's a controlled game.
,and flyou
#36
10-24-2008, 12:48 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pearl City, HI
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: McPukes Monopoly Game Board
ORIGINAL: shoortbuss
REALITY CHECK...If you get a rare piece and are dumb enough to not realize that it would cost you $10 in food to get the other missing pieces, then you deserve to lose half the prize by sharing it with somebody you don't even know. Why does everybody think I'm bashing people by telling you this??? I'm trying to help here, so hear me out...
Let me explain how the monopoly game works. They make hundreds of millions of the COMMON pieces. I'll use the $50,000 prize as an example. There are millions and millions and millions and millions of 269 (North Carolina Ave) and 268 (Pacific Ave) pieces out there for people to collect. There are only a set number of 270 (Pennsylvania Ave) pieces. For example, if they were giving out 10 $50,000 prizes this year, there would be10 Pennsylvania Ave pieces. Makes sense so far, right?
So if you manage to get ahold of a 270, and you are dumb enough to come to this forum and split the money with somebody who can give you a 268 and 269, then you deserve to lose that money because it would have cost you the price of 10 extra value meals to get every common piece that McDonalds makes.
If you guys want to continue to rip into me and bash me for trying to help some potentially naive fool from coming onto this thread and giving money to somebody who doesn't deserve it, please do. I eat at McD's quite a bit, and if I stumble upon a rare piece without having the common pieces to go with it, you'd better believe that I'm gonna eat more McDonalds and get the easy to find pieces rather than share my winnings with some guys on the internet that refuse to accept that it's a controlled game.
REALITY CHECK...If you get a rare piece and are dumb enough to not realize that it would cost you $10 in food to get the other missing pieces, then you deserve to lose half the prize by sharing it with somebody you don't even know. Why does everybody think I'm bashing people by telling you this??? I'm trying to help here, so hear me out...
Let me explain how the monopoly game works. They make hundreds of millions of the COMMON pieces. I'll use the $50,000 prize as an example. There are millions and millions and millions and millions of 269 (North Carolina Ave) and 268 (Pacific Ave) pieces out there for people to collect. There are only a set number of 270 (Pennsylvania Ave) pieces. For example, if they were giving out 10 $50,000 prizes this year, there would be10 Pennsylvania Ave pieces. Makes sense so far, right?
So if you manage to get ahold of a 270, and you are dumb enough to come to this forum and split the money with somebody who can give you a 268 and 269, then you deserve to lose that money because it would have cost you the price of 10 extra value meals to get every common piece that McDonalds makes.
If you guys want to continue to rip into me and bash me for trying to help some potentially naive fool from coming onto this thread and giving money to somebody who doesn't deserve it, please do. I eat at McD's quite a bit, and if I stumble upon a rare piece without having the common pieces to go with it, you'd better believe that I'm gonna eat more McDonalds and get the easy to find pieces rather than share my winnings with some guys on the internet that refuse to accept that it's a controlled game.
#37
10-24-2008, 12:50 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pearl City, HI
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: McPukes Monopoly Game Board
ORIGINAL: FFCBRf4i
Should we put a cap at the number of people we can have per piece? There's no use if we're going to share a $50 prize if 50 people are in it. If we do put a cap, I suggest adjusting accordingly the number of people we cap the piece at in relation to the prize; ie low prize = less people, bigger prize = more people allowed.
Should we put a cap at the number of people we can have per piece? There's no use if we're going to share a $50 prize if 50 people are in it. If we do put a cap, I suggest adjusting accordingly the number of people we cap the piece at in relation to the prize; ie low prize = less people, bigger prize = more people allowed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
