HAHAHA, damn i think they are a great size already. my freinds brother knows kat, and he was actually on her show the other day. he was the huge bald guy and the party haha, anyway. i dont think she needs it.

 

When you're sixty I don't think you will care what your tats look like anymore. At least the few that I know don't care anymore, and they liked having them when younger. More power to them.

 

Heh I have to agree with Fish/Ten/Hate. She looks great already any more might ruin the look.

 

Please take me out of that statement. She was a beautiful girl, before tattoos, now she is a f**king mess. Big ****, small ****, perfect ****, no ****, she looks like a train wreck. She is nothing but a nasty mess. I'd do her with the lights off and sneak out before sun up rather than face that freakshow in the daylight.

 

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo when i was watching the ink show(the first one) i was like y is nobady hittin` on here??? besides her gay guy.

 

^^^ Hahaha, Christ-chex.Wow. That's funny

 

here is my problem with all those cute little flower tattoos and crap that women get. Imagine when they turn 60 and gravity kicks in. That cute little flower will be a full blown decrepit garden full of weeds. That cute little dolphin tattoo suddenly turns in shammoo the killer whale. No thanks, pass for this guy.

 

So you wouldn't **** her now because she'll look weird when she's 60?? I'd do "nasty unforgivable things" to be able to have one night.[>:]

 

I'd hit it

 

She looks like a dirty, slutty, *****...and that kind of turns my crank, I have to admit it. I am not going to get turned on by a girl in a knee lenght skirt and a button up blouse with lace accents. After I got done doing things to her that I wouldn't do to a trapped sheep, I'd call it a day and not worry about her at 40/50/60+ years old. [sm=devilgrin.gif]