took the words right out of my mouth...

 

agreed. Just dont hit on me and were fine...unless its two (hot) lesbians...then i would like to watch

 

I have respect for anyone who defends this country and our way of life. I don't care what their sexual orientation is.

 

i'm in the military currently, and have worked with, or around homosexuals. I have no problem working with them, or them being in the forces....as long as they pull their weight, and do their job to the expected levels. Only problems I have ever encountered is the extremely flamboyant ones, that flaunt it, or use it as an excuse to get out of work. You wanna defend freedom, and your country GOOD FOR YOU! just don't make me pull your weight or do your job for you. I also believe in the "Don't ask, Don't tell" mentality, a person is a person regardless of color/race, sex, or sexual orientation andwhatever happens in their household is their business, not mine!

 

I love it how people talk about gays as if they are a ****ing different kind of species. THEY'RE HUMAN ****ING BEINGS!!! The title should say, "Horses in the military" and the first post should be. How do you feel about horses being in the military and do you think they should be?

There that's a ****ing thread.

 

Wait post before this one was about a cheating wife and now gay's in the military...

Is there something you need to get off your chest Tatum??????

 

Man I really don't feel like getting dragged into this ****, but I feel I must at least make some comment. So here it is. If the regulations need to be changed then change the damn regulations, but does anyone commenting here understand the mindset behind the first rules concerning this issue? Is this issue being brought to the forum floor, because of Congresswoman Baldwin's recent comments does anyone here understand the larger implication behind this type of regulation let's touch on one of them. Sexual misconduct has been an issue for the United States Military as far back as the 1st World War maybe even father than that. Should we discuss the alleged murder suicide Years ago, when the Navy claimed a gunnersmate intentionally blew up a gun turrent over an alleged homosexual triangle or should we discuss more mainstream. Things like operation Tailhook or the former U.S. Army's Top Sergeant alleged sexual misconduct or the most recent murder and abduction at Camp Lejeune there are broad ranging issues concerning regulations that often can't be looked at without taking the big picture into perspective. Or maybe should take this post, a little more lightheartedly and said hell the Air Force wants to make the entire opposition gay. But if you think that's a joke. I suggest you click on the link provided below.


I will end this post with one statement. There is absolutely no room in a warrior culture for anything other than platonic feelings. For those who surround you, we have already jeopardized and clouded that issue with the integration of both genders serving side by side. Human nature (heterosexual or homosexual) can not be overcome by those with weak willpower, and when you're dealing with a population of individuals whose ages range between 18 and 24, who operate with a reactionary mind and not a mind of forethought. You're absolutely asking for trouble... Yes, Change the God Damn Regulation, but Changing in the Right Manner and for the Right Reasons

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbe...vers_us_m.html

 

Seven point five million dollars...wow, all I need is .01 percent of that to pay for rent and college for the next three years...hmm, I wonder which has a better chance of happening, a gay bomb or a hundred college degrees...hmm...better watch out terrorists...you're about to sing the rainbow. ****ing hell.

 

Brandon calm the **** down, I can see I am having far too much of an influence on you. LOL... your response is one reason, the do not ask do not tell policy was put into place for those who become upset and defend the rights of others to enjoy the same form of normalcy as those who surround them. As I said above, there is a broad spectrum of reasons for the current rules being in place. I personally believe there are some issues that should have been addressed. Originally that was not. A revision is in order as far as I'm concerned. I think hate crime action, sexual misconduct, along with a few others, that cover this whole topic should be re-addressed in the regulation should be revised


Just take a look at this thread at the individuals who are normally like-minded that are not necessarily in agreement. And you can understand how much of a complicated issue this truly is. You must take the whole perspective in and evaluate the big picture. It is a hell of a lot more complicated than just letting someone stand up and say I am homosexual. Get over it

 

http://www.livevideo.com/video/A6B03...-gay-bomb.aspx