Off Topic A place for you CBR junkies to boldly go off topic. Almost anything goes.

1994 cbr600 vs. 1984 cb750

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 12:48 AM
  #1  
jdub22's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: grand island ne
Default 1994 cbr600 vs. 1984 cb750

So me and a friend were talking and he is getting a cb750. He thinks he will be able to smoke me on it. I looked up the specs and that bike has like 68 horsepower. Criticize if you want but do you guys think that is possible with his stock 750 vs my cbr 600. Also what is the difference between our engines he said he has DOHC.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 12:57 AM
  #2  
spicymeowmix's Avatar
Official Welcome Crew Spicy Cat
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 3
From: Auburn, AL
Default

the old cb750s?

Google Image Result for http://motorbike-search-engine.co.uk/classic_bikes/1972_CB750.jpg

that bike?
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 01:42 AM
  #3  
CBRfenatic93's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 611
Likes: 2
From: Shreveport, LA
Default

Originally Posted by jdub22
So me and a friend were talking and he is getting a cb750. He thinks he will be able to smoke me on it. I looked up the specs and that bike has like 68 horsepower. Criticize if you want but do you guys think that is possible with his stock 750 vs my cbr 600. Also what is the difference between our engines he said he has DOHC.
I doubt his would win but then again if you suck at shifting he has a chance. I beat a gsxr 750 but the dude didnt know how to shift.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 01:44 AM
  #4  
jdub22's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: grand island ne
Default

No the 1984 nighthawks. With dual overhead cams
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 09:20 AM
  #5  
adrenalnjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 3
From: West Monroe,Louisiana
Default

84 Nighthawk S? 84-86's were only 700cc's if sold in the US.


Back then there were federal limitations on importing bikes larger than 700cc (guess even back then Harley needed federal bailouts).

Love these old bikes though - would love to find one - almost bought one right before I picked my F2 up.

Warn your buddy though - those bikes had a common problem with the alternator/starter - they were chain driven to the crank, and that chain and tensioner is prone to failure. Replacing means pulling the motor and splitting the case. Expensive as hell for a shop to do, but not that huge a deal if willing to do the work yourself.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 09:54 AM
  #6  
adrenalnjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 3
From: West Monroe,Louisiana
Default

First off - you know what dual overhead cams are, right? Your motor has them too. Means the camshafts sit on top of the valvetrain, instead of the valvetrain being actuated by pushrods from below (Like a typical American V8 motor).

the 84-86 700S was rated at about 80hp, and had a wet weight of about 495lbs. So - it was a little down on power from a stock 94 600F2 (Rated at 100hp) and was a touch heavier. That being said - it probably has plenty of get up and go- and I bet it has a pretty stout bottom end and mid range.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 11:46 AM
  #7  
billetproof97's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: wichita falls, texas
Default

Those old cb750's are great bikes. Ive got a ol 80' CB750C im working on.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 06:52 PM
  #8  
champ24's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Appleton, WI
Default

Your bike is faster... But those old bikes are a lot faster than you think. He may give you a good run if you raced from a stop up to like 50 of 60 mph.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 07:29 PM
  #9  
xricer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: SW Ontario, Canada
Default

Your bike is faster for sure. It depends who is the better rider.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 09:34 PM
  #10  
pacemaker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,473
Likes: 3
From: Newcastle, N.S.W. Australia
Default

At the lower end rev range, your going to be surprised. Those old in line 4's have plenty of bottom & mid range grunt. That's how they built them then. My old 81 Z650 only did just over the ton (105mph?), but didn't take a lot to get it there & in the twisties its bottom end & engine braking where great. However the F's is lighter, greater top end speed, better handling (suspension & frame), clearance & brakes. But its all a mute point, it also depends on the skill & commitment of each rider. If its just a p*ssing competition, tell him you love his "Old" classic.
 

Last edited by pacemaker; Apr 19, 2011 at 09:37 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.