First heatwaves, then bushfires and now this.....
#1
First heatwaves, then bushfires and now this.....
The Smurfs have been naughty!
Smurfs sought for questioning over assault
A 37-year-old man was allegedly confronted by men in blue at the store in Pascoe Vale last month.
Police say one of the Smurfs demanded the man light a cigarette for him, but he was attacked when he refused.
and then............
Smurfs arrested over Melbourne assault
What is the world coming to??
Living up to their names perhaps?
Or too much of this?
Cheers, SB
Smurfs sought for questioning over assault
A 37-year-old man was allegedly confronted by men in blue at the store in Pascoe Vale last month.
Police say one of the Smurfs demanded the man light a cigarette for him, but he was attacked when he refused.
and then............
Smurfs arrested over Melbourne assault
What is the world coming to??
Living up to their names perhaps?
Or too much of this?
Cheers, SB
Last edited by Sebastionbear1; 01-09-2013 at 02:10 AM.
#3
#4
Cheers, SB
#5
So did they beat the guy's *** in the parking lot?
I just don't want to see any smurfs wrongfully accused.
#6
In two parts:
1.
ker·fuf·fle
/kərˈfəfəl/
Noun
A commotion or fuss.
Synonyms
fuss
2. Yes
And I think they did the honorable Smurf thing and handed their blue bodies into the Police
Cheers, SB
PS: Todays post was brought to you by the letters K F and L and the colour BLUE
Last edited by Sebastionbear1; 01-10-2013 at 12:00 AM.
#7
#8
Here Mattson, let me help you.........
Cheers, SB
PS: Colin Hay the lead singer of Men at Work was born in Scotland
#9
Time for a ruling, Gentlemen.
It is the finding of this honourable Court that
The Smurfs were provoked and furthermore that the Member of the public /complainant had been imbibing of copious quantities of Smurfnoff, for which the Smurfs cannot be held accountable. They produce it, they don't control its consumption.
It is furthermore appararent that the Smurfs had not been paid for the abovementioned Smurfnoff, and were attempting to obtain redress from the complainant, which gave the appearance of a Kerfuffle.
The Smurfs are therefore found not guilty, and have been advised by this Court to seek redress for the amounts claimed to be owed to them by the complainant in the Civil Court.
Case closed.
Court's adjourned.
Now Papa Smurf, how about another tumbler of that Smurfnoff if you please............and one for the Counsel for the Defence Advocate Kilgoretrout.
It is the finding of this honourable Court that
The Smurfs were provoked and furthermore that the Member of the public /complainant had been imbibing of copious quantities of Smurfnoff, for which the Smurfs cannot be held accountable. They produce it, they don't control its consumption.
It is furthermore appararent that the Smurfs had not been paid for the abovementioned Smurfnoff, and were attempting to obtain redress from the complainant, which gave the appearance of a Kerfuffle.
The Smurfs are therefore found not guilty, and have been advised by this Court to seek redress for the amounts claimed to be owed to them by the complainant in the Civil Court.
Case closed.
Court's adjourned.
Now Papa Smurf, how about another tumbler of that Smurfnoff if you please............and one for the Counsel for the Defence Advocate Kilgoretrout.
#10
Time for a ruling, Gentlemen.
It is the finding of this honourable Court that
The Smurfs were provoked and furthermore that the Member of the public /complainant had been imbibing of copious quantities of Smurfnoff, for which the Smurfs cannot be held accountable. They produce it, they don't control its consumption.
It is furthermore appararent that the Smurfs had not been paid for the abovementioned Smurfnoff, and were attempting to obtain redress from the complainant, which gave the appearance of a Kerfuffle.
The Smurfs are therefore found not guilty, and have been advised by this Court to seek redress for the amounts claimed to be owed to them by the complainant in the Civil Court.
Case closed.
Court's adjourned.
Now Papa Smurf, how about another tumbler of that Smurfnoff if you please............and one for the Counsel for the Defence Advocate Kilgoretrout.
It is the finding of this honourable Court that
The Smurfs were provoked and furthermore that the Member of the public /complainant had been imbibing of copious quantities of Smurfnoff, for which the Smurfs cannot be held accountable. They produce it, they don't control its consumption.
It is furthermore appararent that the Smurfs had not been paid for the abovementioned Smurfnoff, and were attempting to obtain redress from the complainant, which gave the appearance of a Kerfuffle.
The Smurfs are therefore found not guilty, and have been advised by this Court to seek redress for the amounts claimed to be owed to them by the complainant in the Civil Court.
Case closed.
Court's adjourned.
Now Papa Smurf, how about another tumbler of that Smurfnoff if you please............and one for the Counsel for the Defence Advocate Kilgoretrout.
Smurferiffic Shadow, they'll paint the streets blue tonight.
Cheers, SB