General Tech Good at troubleshooting? Have a non specific issue? Discuss general tech topics here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

520 conversion that much better??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-07-2009, 11:52 AM
929 RR's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 520 conversion that much better??

was considering goin with a smaller chain has any1 dun this? if so can u tell?
 
  #2  
Old 05-07-2009, 08:06 PM
jonld's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

lots of people do it but its a waste. the weight decrease is minimal and the setup wears out alot faster.
 
  #3  
Old 05-08-2009, 08:54 AM
skoobydoobie's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Detroit
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^+1^...Unless you are trying to shave a tenth of a second off your lap time stick with the 525, oh wait, you're riding a 929RR you should have the 530 chain on your bike. If you're looking for more bottom end torque then you can change the gear ratio of the sprockets (-1/+2 is common) but your top end will suffer a lil.
 
  #4  
Old 05-08-2009, 09:06 AM
929 RR's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thnx the sales man at the local shop is telling me i cud free up so much horse power nd torque with the lighter rotation off mass cuz the engine wont have to work as hard to turn the sprockets nd chain
 
  #5  
Old 05-08-2009, 08:44 PM
randyjoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Paradise (DFW), Tx
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 929 RR
thnx the sales man at the local shop is telling me i cud free up so much horse power nd torque with the lighter rotation off mass cuz the engine wont have to work as hard to turn the sprockets nd chain
The HP increase from the weight decrease is pretty small and not noticeable by the average rider, depends where you look, but most references will say 2-5 hp.

If you want more torque, as was said earlier, change the sprockets (-1/+2), but leave the 530. Cheaper that way.
 
  #6  
Old 05-08-2009, 09:37 PM
jonld's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 929 RR
thnx the sales man at the local shop is telling me i cud free up so much horse power nd torque with the lighter rotation off mass cuz the engine wont have to work as hard to turn the sprockets nd chain
Thats why he's a sales man and not and engineer.
 
  #7  
Old 05-09-2009, 09:34 AM
pbeland's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not supposed to go 520 on 750cc and up, chain probably wont handle the abuse and definately wear out faster. not worth getting hurt or major bike damage. if you had a 600 you could do the chain and sprockets, but hwy speed and speedo being off are other factors, search it up, lots of info in the 600rr sections on this setup
 
  #8  
Old 05-10-2009, 04:00 PM
CB750's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonld
Thats why he's a sales man and not and engineer.
Exactly. You don't want to "under-engineer" your bike, especially if you are racing, and it sounds like you are going to.

"Lighter rotation of mass" lol, you could "free up" more hp by chopping off an arm or leg, that's got to be a good 30 pounds.
 
  #9  
Old 05-13-2009, 09:57 PM
pbeland's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

to the defence of the setup, yea it helps a bit, especially for the smaller cc, but true, rotation of mass being lighter isnt as big of a deal as with cars. Dieting/exercise is your cheapest and most effective way to shorten the hp/weight ratio, thats one thing I never understood about these guys at autocrosses that spend all sorts of money saving a pound or two on their car, yet they are overweight trying to squeeze into their car. reminds me of the 270lb. guy that ran his civic at the strip all motor dipping into the 10s, maybe he could let someone half that weight run the thing a whole lot quicker
 
  #10  
Old 05-17-2009, 09:28 AM
929 RR's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

diet nd exersize sounds ok considering iAlredi do thats me LOL

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...1&l=fcfeb49fd4

any other idea how to lose sum weight on the bike considering im 5'8" 175
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DopeBoy239
CBR 600F2
0
06-26-2010 12:06 PM
bammerman
CBR 600F3
2
05-27-2010 04:40 PM
chuckb
Stunters Corner
7
04-30-2007 08:52 PM
transamlt1man
Off Topic
12
07-19-2006 09:47 PM
steve00ses
CBR 600RR
9
07-17-2006 04:11 PM



Quick Reply: 520 conversion that much better??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.