F4i - Main Forum Main F4i discussion board

What Gas do you run?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 05-27-2009, 01:02 PM
teko1020's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I fill up 2 maybe 3 times a week. 3 gallons each time. 60 cents extra each fill up. 1.8x52=93.6... I'll stick with 87 and still get the same performance as your 93, thanks.
 

Last edited by teko1020; 05-27-2009 at 01:14 PM.
  #22  
Old 05-27-2009, 01:06 PM
Elfling's Avatar
Ladies Lounge Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And that's fine Whatever works. It's going to be one of those eternal six of one, half dozen of another questions.
 
  #23  
Old 05-27-2009, 01:51 PM
Zero1080's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

teko, the grocery store example was horrible lol. Not to be rude. The numbers you gave me in apparent what you'd buy, maybe 15oz for 2.98 lol.
 
  #24  
Old 05-27-2009, 02:29 PM
Followme438's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, my experience states that the 87 runs nearly equal to the 93 in my F4i. I normally get 130ish miles per tank. (that's taking into account the error from my non-stock gearing.) I've tried this on multiple occasions and have noticed no discernable difference between the two fuels beyond price. For all of those nit-pickers out there, I use Chevron gas at all times (I have an account with them). Personally, I say use what you can afford and makes you happy.
 
  #25  
Old 05-27-2009, 02:38 PM
cman9toes's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tifton, Ga
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok everyone breath....now this is an eternal arguement.

Some believe higher octane=better gas/better performance. I say it is placibo effect.

I fill up with 87,perfer no ethanol, every 160 miles or so. Bike runs great and have tried 93 with no changes in performance.

All fuel is the same, the difference between brands is additives and better storage practices/ higher turnover in stock.

Gasoline at the pump is stabil for at least one year after manufacturing

Rennen I promise that you did not lose 40mpg simple from octane switch, octane does not have the ability to alter the amount of energy produced in burning the fuel. It inhibits pre-ignition.

So unless your bikes engine is "dieseling" uncontrollably I say you were getting on the trottle harder to "check" performance.
 
  #26  
Old 05-27-2009, 02:44 PM
Rennen's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

w/e. everyone has their own opinion, and it's not going to change. people should do what they want to make themselves happy.
 
  #27  
Old 05-27-2009, 03:18 PM
cageless's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mankato, MN
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cman9toes
Ok everyone breath....now this is an eternal arguement.

Some believe higher octane=better gas/better performance. I say it is placibo effect.

I fill up with 87,perfer no ethanol, every 160 miles or so. Bike runs great and have tried 93 with no changes in performance.

All fuel is the same, the difference between brands is additives and better storage practices/ higher turnover in stock.

Gasoline at the pump is stabil for at least one year after manufacturing

Rennen I promise that you did not lose 40mpg simple from octane switch, octane does not have the ability to alter the amount of energy produced in burning the fuel. It inhibits pre-ignition.

So unless your bikes engine is "dieseling" uncontrollably I say you were getting on the trottle harder to "check" performance.
Finally someone who knows higher octane does not = quality/ performance!

some people are so ignorant
 
  #28  
Old 05-27-2009, 03:23 PM
Elfling's Avatar
Ladies Lounge Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cageless
Finally someone who knows higher octane does not = quality/ performance!

some people are so ignorant
You catch more flies with honey than vinegar.
 
  #29  
Old 05-27-2009, 03:24 PM
teko1020's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zero1080
teko, the grocery store example was horrible lol. Not to be rude. The numbers you gave me in apparent what you'd buy, maybe 15oz for 2.98 lol.
I could go back with my camera and take a pic if you like. That's exactly what the price was. This was miracle whip and not plain mayonnaise. Sad part is I bet a lot of people bought the bigger size without even comparing the price.
 

Last edited by teko1020; 05-27-2009 at 03:27 PM.
  #30  
Old 05-27-2009, 03:37 PM
jpanside@gmail.com's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a1997 CBR F3. I always run premium. is this bad? better? or the same?

I wanna see proof cuz I dont really believe that premium can make the bike worse...
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM.