F4i - Main Forum Main F4i discussion board

THE CCTL Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 11:01 PM
  #61  
Batten's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Hi Guys i just finished reading this thread and have ordered the part from honda, it arrived today it (14520MBW724) it looks to be a automatic tensioner. Does that matter?
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 11:17 PM
  #62  
vangill's Avatar
July 2010 ROTM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

honda only makes automatic ones, what do u mean?
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 11:24 PM
  #63  
Batten's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

sorry the guide i was looking at had a manual one, i was getting confused. thought i might have got the wrong part.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 12:27 AM
  #64  
vangill's Avatar
July 2010 ROTM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

It's ok. Just didn't quite understand. When I do mine I'll go with another auto one
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 12:30 AM
  #65  
Batten's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

i would assume installing a auto one would be eaven easirt than a manual one?
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 08:43 AM
  #66  
DBEAU's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Default

Originally Posted by Batten
i would assume installing a auto one would be eaven easirt than a manual one?
Correct, the stock auto tensioner is about as easy as it gets. You just install, pull out the key and you're done.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 09:53 PM
  #67  
DBEAU's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Default

Question: If a manual tensioner is sufficient, than why does the factory use an automatic tensioner?
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #68  
vangill's Avatar
July 2010 ROTM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

from what ive heard its bc the chain needs different amounts of tension at different rpms and the auto one compensates whereas the manual does no compensation
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 07:35 AM
  #69  
knb13's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, PA
Default

Originally Posted by DBEAU
Question: If a manual tensioner is sufficient, than why does the factory use an automatic tensioner?
similiar to why if a 5speed transmission is sufficient, then why do they make auto trannys?

For ease of use. I put the Honda auto tensioner in my bike because I wanted to put it in and forget it. I didn't want to worry about adjusting it wrong or having to adjust it if there was slack.

For as easy as it was to put it, I will gladly do it again in another 15k miles if it makes noise again.
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2010 | 11:54 AM
  #70  
DBEAU's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Default

I can completely understand the convenience factor, but it seems to me there may be more to it than just convenience. Just as vangill said, is it because the chain requires fluctuations in tension? If so, wouldn't a manual tensioner be harmful?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.