CBR 954RR 2002 - 2003 - CBR 954RR Forum

Front fork leak - OEM or AFM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-17-2018, 11:45 AM
kahlilj's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal, Atl, Pitt,...
Posts: 95
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Front fork leak - OEM or AFM

My left front fork is leaking. I'm thinking the seal needs replacing. If so I can go OEM, but I'm always looking for a reasonable mods/upgrades when possible.

So I'm considering replacing with Racetech or Ohlins. not the whole front fork, but maybe replace the innards? What are y'all thoughts on Ohlins vs Racetech. Also I'm thinking to replace OEM with Racetech Type 1 gold valve. I don't see any similar part on Ohlin's site though - just the actual fork or springs. Is there a competing valve they make? I won't be doing the work myself, but have a mechanic or indie shop do it.

Also I'm no suspension expert at all and am not sure that I can only replace the valve (along with the seals and maybe bushings?). Will this be an improvement in doing so?
Here's a pic of the Racetech type 1 valve kit:



Thanks for any and all feedback.
 
  #2  
Old 08-17-2018, 03:10 PM
tentacleslap's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 596
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

FWIW, I've had a good experience with Racetech springs, but Ohlins is well... Ohlins

I recently installed a set Racetech springs on my '87 and I'm really happy with it. One thing I like about the Racetech approach is that they take the rider's weight and riding style into account when they recommend rates, (or rates/stacks if you go with the valves). It seems like they put a lot of effort into trying to tailor their recommendations to the rider and they've got a lot of documentation to back it up. I'm a technical guy, so I like to nerd out on that sort of thing, and it's also more beginner friendly to start with a good recommendation and go from there. Ohlins typically offers a range of products without a lot of support to go with it

That said, I've only used their springs and have no experience with the valves/stacks. They seem to promise a lot of benefits, but I feel like suspension is generally a game of compromises, so a bit of research would be your friend if you plan to make big changes. I probably wouldn't bother with just the valves, but if I was going up to stiffer springs the valves might help take some of the edge off. The most important part will be the springs, and they are sold by rate (basically how much force is needed to compress the spring a certain amount) with higher rates meaning a stiffer spring. They also come in progressive or linear, which means about what you'd expect. Next is the preload, which is literally just a short length of tube that pushes against the spring to 'pre-load' it. On adjustable setups, this will be easily changed by tightening or loosening the adjuster. On non-adjustable setups you can swap out the tube for different lengths. Third, you can substitute different weights of oil, and add or remove oil to tune the amount of air that is in the fork (more air = more compressibility). I haven't messed with oil too much, I usually just run the recommended

It's probably a bit of a placebo, but I do like feeling like I'm riding something that's been tailored, and even better after experimenting with different preloads. I find a stiff, linear spring helped me feel more settled entering a corner, and gives a bit of confidence when I need it most (ie right at weight transfer) but if I take the preload too far, it'll feel chattery and unsettled on rough pavement. Plus my old bike dives really sharply on braking, and none of this is helped by the fact that I'm a heavier guy on a big steel bike. I imagine the 954 is at a much better starting-point performance-wise, so you'll want to try and find something that works for you. If they need to come apart anyway, I'd say go for it, but start with a plan so you're not just throwing money at a problem that doesn't really exist

Just my 2c
 
  #3  
Old 08-18-2018, 08:00 AM
kahlilj's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal, Atl, Pitt,...
Posts: 95
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tentacleslap
FWIW, I've had a good experience with Racetech springs, but Ohlins is well... Ohlins

I recently installed a set Racetech springs on my '87 and I'm really happy with it. One thing I like about the Racetech approach is that they take the rider's weight and riding style into account when they recommend rates, (or rates/stacks if you go with the valves). It seems like they put a lot of effort into trying to tailor their recommendations to the rider and they've got a lot of documentation to back it up. I'm a technical guy, so I like to nerd out on that sort of thing, and it's also more beginner friendly to start with a good recommendation and go from there. Ohlins typically offers a range of products without a lot of support to go with it

That said, I've only used their springs and have no experience with the valves/stacks. They seem to promise a lot of benefits, but I feel like suspension is generally a game of compromises, so a bit of research would be your friend if you plan to make big changes. I probably wouldn't bother with just the valves, but if I was going up to stiffer springs the valves might help take some of the edge off. The most important part will be the springs, and they are sold by rate (basically how much force is needed to compress the spring a certain amount) with higher rates meaning a stiffer spring. They also come in progressive or linear, which means about what you'd expect. Next is the preload, which is literally just a short length of tube that pushes against the spring to 'pre-load' it. On adjustable setups, this will be easily changed by tightening or loosening the adjuster. On non-adjustable setups you can swap out the tube for different lengths. Third, you can substitute different weights of oil, and add or remove oil to tune the amount of air that is in the fork (more air = more compressibility). I haven't messed with oil too much, I usually just run the recommended

It's probably a bit of a placebo, but I do like feeling like I'm riding something that's been tailored, and even better after experimenting with different preloads. I find a stiff, linear spring helped me feel more settled entering a corner, and gives a bit of confidence when I need it most (ie right at weight transfer) but if I take the preload too far, it'll feel chattery and unsettled on rough pavement. Plus my old bike dives really sharply on braking, and none of this is helped by the fact that I'm a heavier guy on a big steel bike. I imagine the 954 is at a much better starting-point performance-wise, so you'll want to try and find something that works for you. If they need to come apart anyway, I'd say go for it, but start with a plan so you're not just throwing money at a problem that doesn't really exist

Just my 2c
Good stuff tslap & ironically researching is exactly what I've been doing since posting this and came to this same point:

I was looking at a table on Racetech's site comparing OEM spring rates vs what they recommend based on rider weight, riding style/conditions & suspension changes. They indicated stock spring rate is 0.71 kg/mm and recommend a 0.95 kg/mm for my needs. Almost 33% more -That is huge difference! Anyone know the stock spring rates on 954's?

Now I'm wondering if changing the springs would be a better move than changing the valves? Or if changing the springs would be of better value than changing the valves? Can't afford to do both at this point
 
  #4  
Old 08-20-2018, 03:51 PM
tentacleslap's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 596
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Springs are fairly cheap, so if you want to make improvements, that's probably where I'd start. My bike came with 0.58 kg/mm progressive, and I replaced them with 1.0 kg/mm linear. It was a big change, but definitely the right one
 
  #5  
Old 08-21-2018, 12:01 PM
kahlilj's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal, Atl, Pitt,...
Posts: 95
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tentacleslap
Springs are fairly cheap, so if you want to make improvements, that's probably where I'd start. My bike came with 0.58 kg/mm progressive, and I replaced them with 1.0 kg/mm linear. It was a big change, but definitely the right one
Thanks i have decided to just replace the springs. So what bike was that that came with 0.58kg/mm springs? were the new springs you installed racetech or another brand?
 
  #6  
Old 08-21-2018, 04:48 PM
tentacleslap's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 596
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

It's an '87 Hurricane 1000. Yes, I went with the Racetech springs
 
  #7  
Old 08-25-2018, 02:10 AM
kahlilj's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal, Atl, Pitt,...
Posts: 95
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Springs or springs & valves? cost benefit

So I got quotes from a local shop to install:
  • $450 for springs, seals, bushings,...
  • $600 for Racetech gold valves plus everything quoted for $450 (springs, seals, bushings,...)
Any thoughts? Are these costs high? low? pretty much what to expect?
I was intending to just do springs, but now wondering if I should "spring" another $150 for the valves? Do you think it's worth the extra $150?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gnarly 928
General Tech
3
04-05-2013 12:31 PM
BLUE1000F
CBR 1000F "Hurricane"
3
10-13-2007 12:03 AM
Jaybird180
General Tech
22
02-12-2007 02:20 PM
davethepom
CBR 1000F "Hurricane"
13
11-15-2006 01:32 PM
R1000
CBR 1000F "Hurricane"
5
02-24-2006 05:36 PM



Quick Reply: Front fork leak - OEM or AFM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.