i got my 01 929 dyno last night and i was surprised that i put 143.6 hp to the ground and about 95 ft lbs. all i have done is k&n pc3r and a devil high mount and the air box flapper out and the exhaust valve out.is that high or avg. i want to post my slip on here how can i do that

 

thats impressive but dynoes are subjective

upload it to photobucket and paste the link on the forum

 

Would help to know what kind of dyno it was as well. As Bignibb said dynos are subjective, in other words some dynos put up bigger numbers than others do.

I ran mine on the dyno at the Honda shop here in Jacksonville (heh sorry I think it was a K&N dyno) But I was only putting down 127.6hp and 65.7ftlbs of torque with a rich spot at the 4000rpm range (showed fuel curve as well using an O2 sensor in the exhaust) All I did was PCIII, Leo Vince highpipe slip on and K&N filter. The techs seemed to say that was very good for a 929. /shrug

I'd love to pull some numbers like you posted!!

 

the dyno was one that put laod on the rear tire i dont know what it is called people said it was the better dyno . i just got off work going to bed then i will try to post sheets and some pics

 

ok i think i got it now pics of bike and the slips and some others
http://s372.photobucket.com/albums/oo163/rschisler82/

 

do you have any of your other bikes dynoed as a comparison?

the gsxr
1k?

 

I'll bite........I'll throw the BS flag on the torque number. 929cc is not making 95ftlbs with out being force induced or sprayed or HEAVILY modified internally, likely no longer displacing 929cc.
Your mods are not enough to get that number in the "real" world. If they are you have the best running 929 on earth.
I can see what the graph shows and I can also see that a graph can be fudged to show what ever the tuner wants.
I say you probably have an honest 125-130 rwhp bike on your hands and no where near 90ft lbs....probably closer to 65-68ft lbs.
It's a nice looking graph for sure but I wouldnt go hunting down GSX-R, R1, ZX, CBR liter bikes expecting to beat them in a roll on.
I think the dyno was a little "off".

Nice to think about though.

 

the ftlbs on the chart around 86 ft and a buddy was their with his 954 that had his tuned and dyno some where else put down 140 at the place i was at, and before where ever he got his done he put down 141 so he lost a 1 hp i have no problem taking a 04 05 r1. you can call it bs if you want to you wern't their

 

[sm=yikesomg.gif][sm=youreright.gif]

Ok.

 

http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/hon...blade_2000.php

http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/hon...54_rr_2003.php

well for those that are lasy like me and wont check the links it pretty much says that

929 makes 152hp@11000rpm
76lbsTQ@9000rpm
954 makes 151hp@11250rpm
77lbsTQ@9500rpm

so according to tthem the 929 makes more hp by 1 and the 954 makes more TQ by 1

my question is could i have a copy of the map your running because it has to be the most efficient of any ive heard of, even if i didnt get the -9.4 % drive train loss 9 and the +8.8% increase in TQ

in my limited experience with engine modifications, an engine will not produce more hp or tq than at the crank to the wheels without having modified the internals.

but i am curious have you dynoed any of your other bikes for comparison?

i dynoed my 929 and it made 117hp
rather low
i dynoed my yzf600r and it made 79.8hp
also low

both bike modied filters,plugs,ignition advance, powercommander, pipes ect ect ect

the numbers meant nothing the fact that i was most impresseed it that my 929 made 37+ more hp than my yzf600r and both bikes run great.

now i know that the yzf with similar miles and mods usually puts down 90hp with 100hp at the crank
and if i add 10hp to both numbers, i get the 127 avderager the 929 makes but this is all my own thoughts no proof to these claims