CBR 600F3 1995 - 1998 CBR 600F3 Forum

Tires?

Old Jun 19, 2011 | 05:19 PM
  #1  
hondaben420's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default Tires?

How wide can i go with the back tire on my 96 f3? stock rim and there is already a 170 on it. What about the front?
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2011 | 05:29 PM
  #2  
csp's Avatar
csp
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default

i have a 180/120 set up on stock wheels.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 06:12 AM
  #3  
Mrmanr's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Schulenburg, tx
Default

How does it handle with that setup , 180 on rear?
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 08:50 AM
  #4  
blwnstang02's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

I will be ordering a 180/55/17 and a 120/70/17 tire set here soon.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 03:08 PM
  #5  
SmokinJeff's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

The smart money is on stock sizes. I'm hoping you care about how the bike rides more than what it looks like.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 03:51 PM
  #6  
blwnstang02's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SmokinJeff
The smart money is on stock sizes. I'm hoping you care about how the bike rides more than what it looks like.
If i can tell a huge difference on how it rides when i put around town i may try a 170 rear. I only cruise around town and an occasinal trip to work. I do not have this bike for hard cornering etc. I was planning on a review after i installed them and road it for a little bit.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #7  
blwnstang02's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hondaben420
How wide can i go with the back tire on my 96 f3? stock rim and there is already a 170 on it. What about the front?
Mine came stock with a 120/60-17 front. When i bought it, it came with a 120/70-17. It rides good right now with a 160/60-17 on the back. I plan on switching it to a 180/55-17 rear.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 05:48 PM
  #8  
csp's Avatar
csp
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SmokinJeff
The smart money is on stock sizes. I'm hoping you care about how the bike rides more than what it looks like.
i haven't noticed any problems with a 180 in back... i can lean it over just fine and haven't noticed anything bad with weird flexing or anything like that.

what would go horrendously wrong by putting 10mm extra on over stock? paranoid much?
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 06:01 PM
  #9  
halbritt's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by csp
i haven't noticed any problems with a 180 in back... i can lean it over just fine and haven't noticed anything bad with weird flexing or anything like that.

what would go horrendously wrong by putting 10mm extra on over stock? paranoid much?
It's a well-understood phenomena that the F3 handles less well with a 170 or a 180 on the rear. Folks that race them stick with the 160.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 11:07 PM
  #10  
csp's Avatar
csp
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by halbritt
It's a well-understood phenomena that the F3 handles less well with a 170 or a 180 on the rear. Folks that race them stick with the 160.
seriously?
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.