CBR 1000F "Hurricane" 1987-1996 CBR 1000F

Gen1 vs Gen2 vs Gen3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-16-2010, 05:57 PM
Damo77's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toowoomba Queensland Aus
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Gen1 vs Gen2 vs Gen3

From what i understand the biggest difference between the 3 generations of Fs is between Gen 1&2.
I am thinking of buying a gen 2 or maybe a gen 1 but would like to know what owners think are the pros and cons of each generation. I am partial to older bikes (currently ride CX500s) and would like to know if the improvements between generations make the later model bikes a much better ride or conversely iif they lost something along the way.
Hope i am not stirring up a hornets nest
Cheers
Damo
 
  #2  
Old 11-16-2010, 06:01 PM
Sprock's Avatar
Administrator, MVN / ROTM NOV 2012
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Republic of Boon Island
Posts: 11,004
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

This will be interesting to listen to

Well Gen 3 has linked brakes , gen 2 not, same for gen 1

Fairings are all different , Gen 2 to me seems bulkier with Fairings.

Gen 2 has shorter oem exhaust cans , Gen 3 longer , Gen 1 narrower

Speedo on Gen 1 is front wheel driven , gen 2 & 3 sprocket driven

Gen 2 & 3 seats are same , gen 1 shorter

Personally I like the unlinked brake systems ...BUT .....Gen 3's can be unlinked too.


Shoot I just like all of em ..........currently looking for a Gen 1 ...to complete the collection
 

Last edited by Sprock; 11-16-2010 at 06:07 PM.
  #3  
Old 11-16-2010, 10:07 PM
kilgoretrout's Avatar
Administrator - Retired
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 8,195
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I like the looks of the Gen 3 better than the rest (especially the tail). It also has a slightly more dependable CCT.
The Gen 1 has a skinnier rear wheel, too, which I don't like.
 
  #4  
Old 11-17-2010, 01:19 AM
davethepom's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Somebody just has to say it! The gen 3 is just far prettier. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that the others are, by comparison, quite ugly...There, that should do it

I didn't like the linked brakes, some do. I got mine split and it's great.
 
  #5  
Old 11-17-2010, 09:05 AM
hawkwind's Avatar
September 2009 ROTM Winner - Faster than a Speeding ..........
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,808
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have the Gen2 which I think is the best compromise between looks, de-linked brakes and price.

The gen 3 bike will cost a lot more than the other two and I don't think I'd like the linked brakes either.

The Gen1 bikes go for a song here in the UK, so are a great buy and you get plenty of bang for your buck!

But if I was looking at a Gen3, I'd be tempted to go the extra mile and get a Blackbird
 
  #6  
Old 11-17-2010, 11:05 AM
Sprock's Avatar
Administrator, MVN / ROTM NOV 2012
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Republic of Boon Island
Posts: 11,004
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hawkwind
But if I was looking at a Gen3, I'd be tempted to go the extra mile and get a Blackbird

WHATTTTTT

You Heathen You ..... You know what this means ............. she's gonna give you hell just for
saying such a horrible thing !
 
  #7  
Old 11-17-2010, 11:19 AM
TimBucTwo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bir Tawil
Posts: 4,237
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Gen1 has had fuel pump problems where the gravity feed does not.
Some are not happy with the smaller rear tire on the early model, I have to agree. On my Gen3 I run the 180 in the rear and love it. I also de-linked.

All are the same engine but the later bikes have taller gearing (simple fix).
The Gen1 had slightly further rear foot pegs I believe.

Originally Posted by Sprock
.........currently looking for a Gen 1 ...to complete the collection
I figured this much....just a matter of time.LOL
 
  #8  
Old 11-17-2010, 01:11 PM
Indiana Hurricane's Avatar
Senior Member & 2010 ROTY
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago, Il. USA
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I like the Gen I. I did the rear tire Mod. to a 180. The 87' Model is the one that started it all.
 
  #9  
Old 11-17-2010, 01:44 PM
hawkwind's Avatar
September 2009 ROTM Winner - Faster than a Speeding ..........
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,808
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Sprock
WHATTTTTT

You Heathen You ..... You know what this means ............. she's gonna give you hell just for
saying such a horrible thing !
HA! Knew that would get your goat there Sprock
 
  #10  
Old 11-17-2010, 03:22 PM
Damo77's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toowoomba Queensland Aus
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the replies!
Personally i prefer the look of the Gen 2. Love that dodgy scooter tail light. Sorry Davethepom.
I did think Blackbird but thought they look far too new and alot like everything else.
So seeing as there appears to be no significant advances between gen 2 & 3 i think 2 it will be. Price wise there is not a major differance between a late 2 and early 3 here in Aus although gen 1 appears to be a bit cheaper.
But hey what do i know, i still love my old cx500s
Cheers
Damo
 


Quick Reply: Gen1 vs Gen2 vs Gen3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.